TRS Group Patented PFAS Treatment

Introduction


The United States Patent and Trademark Office has awarded TRS Group, Inc. (TRS) a patent for the thermal treatment of per‐and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in soil (Oberle, D and E. Crownover, 2020). The patented process uses heaters to raise soil temperatures to desorb and volatilize PFAS. Importantly, the target temperatures are high enough to degrade soil organic matter but still low enough to mitigate the risk of forming potentially dangerous PFAS by‐products. As the soil organic matter is destroyed, a vacuum is applied to the soil to remove PFAS by volatilization. The vaporized PFAS is routed to vapor treatment for further processing.

How the TRS Patent Differs from Other Patents


The TRS patent is the only soil heating patent that focuses specifically on thermal treatment of PFAS. Other thermal vendors may claim to have a “patented PFAS treatment;” however, the reference is to patented heating equipment or processes, not the treatment of PFAS.

PFAS Adsorb Strongly to Soil

PFAS include a wide class of anthropogenic fluorinated chemicals. Due to their special surface tension properties, they have been used by multiple industries for many products. Depending on the structure, PFAS can be ionic, non‐ionic or zwitterionic (Backe et al., 2013). Aqueous film‐forming foams (AFFFs) are a common source of PFAS contamination around the world (Houtz, 2013). The AFFFs typically consist of perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs), which have a hydrophobic fluorocarbon tail and a hydrophilic head, most often comprised of a carboxylate or sulfonate functional group. The carbon backbone allows PFAS to adhere to soil by van der Waals forces, due to the organics in the soil (Ferrey et al., 2012). Also, PFAS may interact with soil by ionic charge (Lixia et al., 2014). Adsorption of PFAS can be quite strong. For example, tests have shown that solvent flushing with alcohol was unable to break some of the adsorptive bonds of PFAS to carbon (Ziwen et al., 2014).

TRS’s Patented Process Breaks Adsorptive Bonds and Volatilizes PFAS from Soil


It has been demonstrated that low temperature thermal desorption can remove greater than 99.99 percent of PFAS from soil when performed at a temperature that degrades the organic material in the soil (Crownover et al., 2019). Soil organic matter is efficiently degraded at temperatures in the range of 360⁰C to 450⁰C (Nelson & Sommers, 1996). Greater than 99.99 percent removal of PFAS was achieved by heating and holding soil at a temperature of 400⁰C. The removal of organics from the soil is quite apparent when viewing photographs of the soil before and after treatment (See Figure 1). Figure 1: Soil Before and After Organic Material is Removed by Thermal Treatment

The TRS Process Minimizes the Potential for PFAS Thermal Breakdown Products

There has been some concern that heating PFAS might create toxic breakdown products (USEPA, 2020). The carbon to fluoride chemical bond is the strongest bond in organic chemistry and requires very high temperatures to break (Hurst, 2019). Studies have shown that temperatures in excess of 400⁰C are typically required to cause breakdown of perfluorinated substances (Madorsky et al., 1953; Marhevka, 1982; Muhammad, 2017). The patented TRS process generally operates in the temperature range of 350 to 400⁰C, which is below the temperatures where breakdown products would be anticipated. Therefore, TRS’s patented PFAS process is much safer than other thermal processes, such as rotary kilns or oven‐like chambers, that operate at higher temperatures.

References
Backe, W.J. et al., Zwitterionic, Cationic, and Anionic Fluorinated Chemicals in Aqueous Film forming
Foam Formulations and Groundwater from U.S. Military Bases by Nonaqueous Large‐Volume Injection
HPLC‐MS/MS, Environmental Science Technology, Vol. 47, No. 10., pp. 5226‐5234 (2013).
Crownover, E.C. et al., Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances thermal desorption evaluation, Remediation, Vol. 29, pp 77‐81 (2019).
Ferrey, M.L, et al., Behavior and Fate of PFOA and PFOS in Sandy Aquifer Sediment, Groundwater Monitoring and Remediation, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp 63‐71 (Fall 2012).
Houtz, E.F. et al., Persistence of Perfluoroalkyl Acid Precursors in AFFF‐Impacted Groundwater and Soil, Environmental Science Technology, Vol. 47, No. 15, pp 8187‐8195 (2013).
Hurst, R.I., Managing Risks and Liabilities associated with Per‐ and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs),
CL:AIRE Technical Bulletin TB19, CL:AIRE, London, UK (2019).
Lixia, Z. et al, Comparison of the sorption behaviors and mechanisms of perfluorosulfonates and perfluorocarboxylic acids on three kinds of clay minerals, Chemosphere, Vol. 114, pp 51‐58 (2014).
Madorsky, S.L, Thermal Degradation of Tetrfluoroethylene and Hydrofluoroethylene Polymers in a Vacuum, Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards, Vol. 51, No. 6, pp. 327‐333 (1953).
Marhevka, J.S. et al., Generation of Perfluoroisobutylene Reference Sample and Determination by Gas Chromatography with Electron Capture and Flame Ionization Detection, Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 54, pp
2607‐2610 (December 1982).
Muhammad, S. et al., PTFE‐caoted non‐stick cookware and toxidity concerns: a perspective, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., Vol. 24., pp 23436‐23440 (2017).
Nelson, D.W. and L.E. Sommers, Total Carbon, organic Carbon, and Organic Matter, in METHODS OF SOIL ANALYSIS, PART 3 – CHEMICAL METHODS, editor D.L. Sparks, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI (1996).
Oberle, D. and E. Crownover, PFAS Remediation Method and System, US Patent, Filed June 26, 2018. USEPA Technical Bulletin, Per‐ and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Incineration to Manage PFAS
Waste Streams, February 2020. Ziwen, D. et al., Adsorption behavior and mechanism of perfluorinated compounds on various adsorbents
– A review, Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 274, pp 443‐454 (2014).

Chinese (Simplified)DutchEnglishFrenchGermanItalianPortugueseRussianSpanish

Need an Estimate?

Get in touch today